Context leak map
Where the workflow loses state: what gets re-explained, what gets re-derived, what two tools disagree about, and what nobody owns.
RemoteJungle · step 02 of Diagnose → Map → Install
Send one workflow. Get back the map of where it leaks.
RemoteClarity is the mapping step. It takes one real workflow — the one that keeps landing back on your desk — and returns a written diagnosis: what leaks context, which lane should own what, which gates are missing, and the first thing worth running.
$297
The map documents. It does not execute. Installation is a separate, scoped step. No secret credentials are requested at checkout.
- Item 01
- Context leak map across your tools, docs, and handoffs
- Item 02
- Workflow clarity map: offer, funnel, operations, memory, lanes, QA
- Item 03
- Worker-lane routing plan for a Claude / Codex / Cursor-style stack
- Item 04
- Handoff format and QA gate checklist for each run
- Item 05
- Three concrete mission briefs you can run immediately
- Item 06
- One priority action sprint tied to your current business motion
- Human gate
- Nothing is changed in your systems by this step
- Next action
- Self-install from the map, or apply for an install lane
This lists the structure of what is delivered. It is not a customer result, a sample report, or a promise about outcomes.
01 / What you receive
Six documents, written to be acted on.
Not a course, not a call recording, not a dashboard. A written operating map for one workflow, in a form a human and an agent can both follow.
Workflow clarity map
The workflow drawn as a system — offer, funnel, operations, memory, worker lanes, QA gates — so the moving parts stop living only in your head.
Lane routing plan
Which tool owns which job across a Claude, Codex, Cursor, n8n, Notion, GitHub, or MCP-style stack, and the handoff format between them.
Handoff and QA gate checklist
What each run must return before it counts as done, and where a human gate is mandatory: sends, deploys, spend, deletes.
Three mission briefs
Three runnable briefs for your highest-value recurring work, written in the format the lane expects — inputs, definition of done, constraints, proof.
One priority action sprint
The single sequence worth running first, chosen against the business motion you already have — not a generic 30-day plan.
02 / What you send
The messy version is the useful version.
After payment, the success page and a follow-up email explain exactly what to send. Nothing here requires you to clean anything up first.
Useful to send
- The recurring workflow, described in plain language, including who currently does what.
- The tools actually in play: Claude, Codex, Cursor, n8n, Notion, GitHub, MCP, browser tools, spreadsheets.
- The exact step where it breaks, stalls, or comes back wrong.
- A few real artifacts: a chat export, a doc, a repo path, a screenshot, a task board view.
- The outcome you want the workflow to produce reliably.
Do not send
- Passwords, API keys, tokens, or any secret credential. They are never requested.
- Customer personal data or anything under an NDA you cannot share.
- Production access. The mapping step does not touch your systems.
- Payment or banking details outside of Stripe checkout itself.
03 / Process
Four steps, async, with a human gate at the end.
You are never waiting on a call to find out what happens next. Each step ends with something written.
Checkout
Stripe collects payment and your delivery email. No credentials, no account access, no scope creep at the payment step.
Intake
The success page and a follow-up email explain exactly what to send for the map, in the order it is useful.
Teardown
Your workflow is read as a system: where context lives, who owns each step, how work is handed off, and what proof is missing.
Map returned
You receive the six deliverables above. What you do next — self-install or apply for an install lane — stays your decision.
04 / Fit check
Buy the map when the workflow already exists.
A map needs terrain. If the workflow has not started running yet, the $49 Recipe is the more honest starting point.
Good fit
- You are an AI-native founder, operator, consultant, tiny agency, or product builder already shipping with these tools.
- One workflow repeats often enough that fixing it is worth more than $297 of your time.
- You are the bottleneck: nothing moves unless you route it.
- You want the diagnosis in writing before anyone talks about installation.
Poor fit
- You want fully autonomous agents with no owner, no gate, and no proof.
- You are looking for guaranteed outcomes, revenue numbers, or testimonials.
- You cannot share enough of the workflow for anyone to diagnose it.
- You want the work done rather than mapped — start with a fit check for the install lane instead.
05 / After the map
Two honest ways forward. Both start from the same document.
The map is written so you can install it yourself. If you would rather not, installation is scoped from the same document.
Path A · self-install
Install it yourself
The mission briefs, routing plan, and gate checklist are written to be used directly. The $49 Recipe adds the full field manual and template vault behind the same method.
Add the $49 RecipePath B · installed lane · $750+
Have the lane installed
One approved workflow becomes a running lane: source of truth, mission briefs, roles, handoff receipts, approval gates, and QA proof. Scoped from the map, with access and privacy boundaries confirmed first.
Apply for an install lane06 / Straight answers
Before you pay.
If something here is unclear, the $49 Recipe covers the same method in writing and costs less to be wrong about.
Is this a call?
No. It is async and written. You send the workflow material, you receive the map as documents you can re-read, forward, and hand to an agent.
Does anyone touch my systems?
No. The mapping step is read-only by design. No credentials are requested, and nothing is changed in your tools. Installation is a separate step with its own access conversation.
How is this different from the $49 Recipe?
The Recipe is the general method: field manual and templates you apply yourself. RemoteClarity applies that method to your specific workflow and returns a diagnosis for it.
What if the map says the problem is not the workflow?
Then that is what the map says. The point is a diagnosis you can act on, including the case where the honest answer is to remove a tool rather than add a system.
Next action
Map one workflow before installing anything.
You get the leak map, the lane routing plan, the gate checklist, three mission briefs, and the first sprint worth running. Then you decide whether to install it yourself or have it installed.
Not ready for a custom map? Start with the $49 Recipe.